Decisions of the 9th Chamber of the Council of State dated June 24, 2025, regarding procedural matters

Last Tuesday, the Ninth Chamber of the Council of State issued several tax-related rulings concerning:

- the possibility of challenging an implied refusal of a request for ex gratia remission: Council of State, 9th Chamber, June 24, 2025, No. 488405, unpublished

- if the decision is based on a reference to another reassessment proposal, proof of its submission: CE, 9th Chamber, June 24, 2025, No. 487864, unpublished

- the time limits for filing a challenge against a SATD with the court: Council of State, 9th Chamber, June 24, 2025, No. 488406, unpublished

- Determination of whether a defense based on the statute of limitations applies to a recovery action: Council of State, 9th Chamber, June 24, 2025, No. 498243, unpublished

- The time limit for invoking the statute of limitations on a collection action in the absence of any mention of the available remedies and time limits in the claim: Council of State, 9th Chamber, June 24, 2025, No. 499358, unpublished

This monitoring service is provided by Mispelon Avocat, a law firm specializing in tax compliance and litigation. You can stay updated by subscribing to the newsletter via this link.

Previous
Previous

Decisions of the 8th Chamber of the Council of State

Next
Next

Non-deductibility of a fee reimbursement: the Council of State grants the appeal