What factors should be considered in determining whether a management decision constitutes an act of mismanagement during the renegotiation of a better fortune clause?

A company had waived the advances on its checking account that had been granted to its manager. This waiver was subject to a clause providing for repayment in the event of improved financial circumstances.

The company was subsequently acquired by another company, which dissolved its now-subsidiary without liquidation. The better fortune clause was then renegotiated and was now more favorable to the former manager.

The company subsequently issued refunds in accordance with the new clause.

Following a tax audit,administration that the relaxation of the better fortune clause and the resulting refunds constituted an abnormal business decision and challenged their deductibility.

In order to define an abnormal management decision,administration determined that:

  • the subsidiary's financial situation would have been difficult because it had taken out a loan

  • The acquisition of the company did not require a renegotiation of the clause

  • the business of the acquired company had been taken over by a new company headed by the manager's daughter

The assessment had been upheld by the Administrative Court of Appeals.

The Conseil d'Etat rule that neither the creation of the new company nor the need to take out a loan is relevant to assessing the company’s interest in renegotiating the better fortunes clause, as the Court had specifically held.

The Council will also note that, contrary to the Administrative Court of Appeal’s ruling, the figures presented—which were not contested byadministration the value of acquiring the company, as well as the fact that a financial partner had taken into account off-balance-sheet commitments, including, in particular, the better-fortune clause.

The Council thus sets aside the judgment of the Administrative Court of Appeal and remands the case to that court.

EC, 9th Chamber, Dec. 10, 2025, No. 497671, unpublished

This monitoring service is provided by Mispelon Avocat, a law firm specializing in tax audits and tax litigation. You can stay updated by subscribing to the newsletter via this link.

Previous
Previous

Can a tax adjustment to a provision be offset by the retroactive rescission of a debt waiver due to a defect in consent?

Next
Next

Retirement of an expatriate employee: Be aware of the classification of lump-sum retirement benefits